Friday, December 27, 2019

Word Without Cell Phones - 860 Words

A Non-Cellular World In today s modern world, there is a great buzz around the latest and greatest in technology. One such massively important gadget, is the cellular telephone. In the last decade or so, cell phones have gotten smaller and smaller, as well as larger in popularity. It is difficult to go anywhere without seeing a person on a cell phone, or using a cell phone in some fashion. Contrary to popular belief, cell phones are not a god-send in my opinion, and looking at the facts, the world would be better off without them. As all of the following evidence shows, people would be safer, healthier and perhaps even smarter, without the presence of cell phones. First, if the cell phone had not been invented, people would not be†¦show more content†¦As explained in consumeraffairs.com, Drivers who don t pay attention or are distracted are three times as likely to be involved in a crash as drivers who pay attention to the road. The number one cause for distraction? The cell phone. The article g oes on to site the fact that these numbers are increasing as well, due to new technological advances in the automobile. Without the cell phone, these accident numbers would more than likely decrease immensely. Gone would be the number one distraction to motorists, lessening the number of crashes. Cancer is currently a hot topic with the country. It seems these days as if everything one can think of causes cancer in some way. The same goes for the cell phone. According to an FDA court case involving Dr. Newman, a renowned MD, Newman s own doctors made the connection between his long-time cell phone use and his tumor, which is positioned in ‘the exact anatomical location where the radiation from the cell phone emitted into his skull . This is explaining how after using his cell phone for nine years, Dr. Newman developed a very serious brain tumor, and he is not alone. Thousands of Americans develop the same types of tumors, positioned almost exactly where the cell phone touches th e skull. Had cell phones not been around in the last few decades, the number of brain tumors would greatly go down. Perhaps the best outcome with this lack of cellular technology, would be the fact that people would beShow MoreRelatedCell Phones And Its Effects On Our Lives862 Words   |  4 Pageswill not leave their house without theirs. The answer to this riddle? Cell phones. Children and adults alike are partaking in the growing addiction to their mobile devices. Can we blame them though? The sheer amount of uses, features, along with other various gizmos that come along with a cell phone are enough to make not having one a handicap on most people. Schools, websites, work places, all are integrating cell phone use into their everyday tasks. Downsides to cell phones do exist, but the benefitsRead MoreCell Phone Technology1488 Words   |  6 PagesCell Phone Technology The cell phone technology that is ever changing by the day was scientifically invented and born back in the early 1980’s. Science was the main key to the birth of the cell phone which was put together by the Motorola Company who today is still making cell phones. Before the cell phone came out the car phone was the first mobile phone which were very large and had to be hooked up to a briefcase which supplied the power for the mobile phone. Science was the utilized to createRead MoreEffects Of Mobile Phones On Society712 Words   |  3 PagesHorrible epidemic of cell phones Everybody has a cell phone, ranging from all ages. Cell phones can be a great invention and way to grow technology if, they are used correctly. The effects of a cell phone have caused with communication in today’s society. Many people use cell phones at inconvenient times sitting at the dinner table, will someone is trying to have a conversation with another person, and while in meetings. Has anyone ever been sitting at the dinner table with someone who is constantlyRead MoreEssay on Drive a Car Not a Cell945 Words   |  4 PagesDrive a Car Not a Cell While operating a vehicle, all cell phone usage should be illegal. Not only is it dangerous for the driver but it also dangerous for the other drivers on the road. Drivers on the road today have many disturbances that impact their driving skills. Necessary action needs to be taken to limit more major harm due to cell phone usage while driving today. (Word Count: 64) First and foremost, cell phone use while driving can be distracting to the driver. Some may say in today’sRead MoreTechnology: The Invention of The Cell Phone Essay1431 Words   |  6 Pagesto communicate with family and friends with one simple device, the cell phone. A cellular phone is the most common type of technology used by all groups of people including parents, teenagers, and even young children. The number of people who own a cell phone also continues to increase, causing a huge distraction on society. Cell phones seem to own a person as they depend on their phone for almost everything. Though the cell phone was invented for beneficial purposes, people have completely misusedRead MoreTechnology Has Made Our Lives1684 Words   |  7 Pages According to Pew Research Center (2015), 91 percent of Americans own cell phones.   For people under the age of 44, the number is closer to 97 percent.   64 percent of those phones are smartphones.   Ã‚  With these phones, we have the world at our fingertips.   We can shop on Amazon and Ebay, get live news updates, and get in touch with our â€Å"friends† from all around the globe on Facebook.   Our cell phones have replaced calculators, cameras, and alarm clocks.   If we want to track our calories, thereRead MoreCell Phones Should Not Be Allowed1276 Words   |  6 PagesCell phones should not be allowed in school. They are classroom distractions, and not a learning device. Every year many students complain about not being able to use their cell phones in school. And every year many schools eventually cave to cater to the things that students complain most about. Schools have been changing and bending rules so that students so that they can use their cell phones d uring school hours. They claim that they can be use as learning devices, which they can be, but you don’tRead MoreTechnology: Revolution or De-evolution Essay1313 Words   |  6 Pagescalled upon. In today’s world being connected means a person has email, internet, and text messaging on their cell phone. With cheap and readily available technologically, advanced gadgets are no further away than a trip to Wal-Mart. It is not uncommon to see anyone from a ten year old to an octogenarian whipping out a cell phone with more computing power than Apollo 1 had. Cell phones, GPS units, and computers all have gone from being conveniences to being a necessity that creates dependence.Read MoreMobile Phones And Its Impact On The Way1559 Words   |  7 Pagescannot go anywhere without seeing at least one person attached to their cell phone texting. This day and age sending a text is the quickest and most efficient form of communication. The Berkman Center for Internet Society at Harvard University found that (78%) of teens now have a cell phone and almost half (47%) of those teens have smartphones. That translates into (37%) of all teens who have cellphones, up from just (23%) in 2011(Madden). Today, people tend to use their phones to text more thanRead MoreMobile Phones And The Mobile Phone987 Words   |  4 PagesIn this day and age, it is almost impossible to not have a cell phone; the number of people who own a cell phone is growing every year. â€Å"At the end of 2011, there were almost 6 billion mobile subscriptions. That is a dramatic increase from 5.4 billion in 2010 and 4.7 billion mobile subscriptions in 2009† (International Tele - communications Union, 2011). With the introduction into society the cell phone established a convenient way to communicate between individuals, and they have also connected

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Four Electric Ghosts, By Mendi And Keith Obadike, Begin

Four Electric Ghosts, by Mendi and Keith Obadike, begin to shape the mold of the theme life after death. Each sister tells her own tale on her experience. Although there are four sisters not all of them connect the same as one another. Each sister shows their involvement in the story and how they grew from such place. M K take the game Pac Man and rewrite a tale to go in to and connect to different pieces of the story. It demonstrates how everyone is on a timeline in their life, and prolonging death or life can be affected with consequences. Similarly, you can connect that to relief experiencing and research to go as far as saying the rewrote Pac Man in a whole different world. By looking for different ways to connect The story of Four†¦show more content†¦Life after death is apparent here in many different ways, such as altering with a passed life can lead you into a position of doubt. The second and third sisters find themselves going through a similar yet different probl em. The second sister becomes part of a community that soon realizes she is not who she said she was. She finds good friends and becomes comfortable where she is. After learning all the ways of the dead, she soon teaches her new friend the same too. Trusting a complete stranger was her first mistake, but this stranger took the secrets and used them against the town. By the time he was gone they banished her from their town called Flavorville. The ways of the dead must be secret for only those who have passed on, and trying to adjust it can lead to negative consequences. The third sister fit in somewhere until she was recognized as not living. As she falls in love with someone alive, their mother soon sees death through her and goes crazy. Losing a son so suddenly, the mother takes her daughter away, no longer to be loved by the third sister until she too crosses over into the land of the dead. Both sisters learn here the penalties between living and dead and messing with them. The Last sister stares at death in the face and is changed dramatically. Little did she know she was being followed by a tornado of havoc, â€Å"Pac Man’. While

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Elizabeth Bathory Blood Couyn Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Elizabeth Bathory: Blood Couyn Essay, Research Paper Countess Bathory was Magyar by birth. Records give her entry into the universe as I56I. As a miss she was beautiful with long just hair and an keen skin color. She was married off to an blue soldier when she was 15 and became kept woman of the Castle of Csejthe in the Carpathians. Life in the dark, glooming Csejthe Castle, while her hubby was off on his assorted military runs, became really deadening so. She was determined to invigorate things up. First she gathered unit of ammunition her a sinister set of enchantresss, magicians and alchemists who taught her the black humanistic disciplines. Then, armed with her particular flesh- lacrimation Ag tweezers, a manual of anguishs her hubby had used when contending the Turks and a gustatory sensation for flagellation learned from her aunt, she set out to indulge herself and while off the alone hours. We will write a custom essay sample on Elizabeth Bathory Blood Couyn Essay Research Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When her hubby died in I6o4 she had reached the hard age of 43. She longed for a new lover to replace him but her contemplation in the mirror showed her that clip and indulgence had non improved her expressions. One twenty-four hours she slapped the face of a servant miss and drew blood with her nails. She was convinced that that portion of her organic structure where the miss # 8217 ; s blood had dripped was much fresher and younger than earlier. It merely needed the alchemists to add their sentiment and she was convinced that imbibing and bathing in the blood of immature virgins would continue her beauty for of all time. So, at the dead of dark, the Countess and her buddies would rupture Bachelor of Arts out the countryside runing for misss. They would be taken back to the palace, hung in ironss and their blood used for the countess’ bath, the finest saved for her to imbibe. The awful adult female carried on like this for five old ages until she began to recognize the blood of peasant misss had non been awfully effectual. In I609 she turned to the girls of her ain category. Offer to take in 25 misss at a clip to educate them in societal graces, she shortly had a booming academy. Helped as usual by her provincial procuress, Dorotta Szentes, know as Dorka, she treated the `pupils # 8217 ; with the same inhumane inhuman treatment as she had treated the others. But this clip she became excessively careless. The organic structures of four misss were thrown over the palace walls. Before she realized her error villagers collected them and took them away to be identified. It was non long before her secret was out. News of her reign of panic eventually reached the ears of the Hungarian Emperor, Matthias II. He ordered that the Countess be brought to test. But as an blue blood she could non be arrested, so Parliament passed a new Act so that she would non be able to steal throught their custodies. At her hearing in 1610 it was said she had murdered 6oo misss. Dorka and her enchantresss were burnt at the interest. The Countess escaped executing because of her baronial birth. But she was condemned to a life decease # 8211 ; walled up in a bantam room of her palace and kept alive by garbages of nutrient pushed through the bars. She died four old ages subsequently without a word of compunction.

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

William Shakespeare (Essay) Example For Students

William Shakespeare (Essay) Ask anyone who Shakespeare was, and he or she will immediately rattle off at least three different plays that were required readings in English, not to mention a few blockbuster movies bearing his name. Many revere the works of Shakespeare as paramount in the world of literature, dedicating entire books, classes and festivals to the study and celebration of his work. Although the ancient language is a common stumbling block for even the most seasoned readers, his varied tales of love, hate, fear, betrayal, laughter, defeat and victory are just as fitting today as they were four hundred years ago. He is amazingly timeless. Yet, while we might know what Shakespeare is, will we ever really know who Shakespeare was? Ah, theres the rub!Much about the Bard is a mystery to even the most scholarly enthusiasts. The hard facts that are actually known about him could fill one neatly handwritten page, but what is speculated and complete legend could fill volumes of books. So, what is fact and wh at is fiction? According to the little documentation that chronicles his life, Shakespeare was not even a true Shakespeare at all; he was born in April 1596 and entered in the baptismal record as Gulielmus filius Johannis Shakespeare. Even his actual date of birth is somewhat of a mystery. While we do know that he was baptized on April 26th, 1564, there is no existing record of his birth date. We can assume that he was born on April 23rd judging by the customary three-day period that most families waited before baptizing their children, but this is only speculation. We will write a custom essay on William Shakespeare () specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Since the records of the Stratford grammar school have not survived, we cannot prove that Shakespeare attended school. In all actuality, we have no evidence that he was even literate. His father had no educational training, so it is quite possible that he also lacked in schooling, but thats only guesswork. The next piece of hard information that we come across in our search is a register entry showing a Wm. Shakspere being granted a license to marry Anne Whateley on November 27, 1582. The very next day this same register records a marriage bond issued to William Shakespeare and Anne Hathwey. Six months later Anne gave birth to their first child, daughter Susanna Shakespeare, and then in February 1585 she gave birth to twins, Hamnet and Judith. It is presumed that Shakespeare made it to London around 1595 to begin his career in the theatre, but the exact date is not known for sure. Just as mysterious is his reason why he left his wife and children alone in Stratford. Sadly, Hamnet die d in August of 1596, and from that point forward we have no more information regarding his family until 1616, the year of his death. There are enough legal documents and theatre records, though, to know that Shakespeare goes on to possess a generous amount of real estate, hold shares in an acting company that built the Globe Theatre, and become a principal player in the acting group The Kings Men (A Midsummer Nights Dream xxx-xxxi). There are many theories and stories floating around that seem to fill in the gaping holes in his timeline, but since this information doesnt appear in a register or on a playbill, we dont know what is fact or fiction. On January 25th, 1616, Shakespeare signs his will in three places leaving the majority of his estate to his eldest daughter, Susanna, and his second-best bed to his wife (All Shakespeare). He died three months later on April 23rd, and was buried in Stratford, yet his name does not appear on the stone over his grave. According the web site All Shakespeare, his supposed tombstone reads:Good friend for Iesus Sake forbeareTo dig the dust encloased heare:Blest be ye man yt spares thes stonesAnd curst be he yet moves my bones. It doesnt sound very Shakespearian, does it?Seven years after his death his collected plays were published as Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, Tragedies (the work now known as the First Folio) (Midsummer Nights Dream xxxii). Everything beyond this is myth and legend, which most certainly adds to the attraction of his works. His brilliant writing can only be enhanced by the mystery surrounding his life. The question is, was it really his brilliant writing? Many theories exist regarding who the author really is, with over eighty Elizabethans put forward since the middle of the eighteenth century as the true Shakespeare, including Queen Elizabeth herself. Only four have merited serious consideration, though: Sir Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, William Stanley (Sixth Earl of Derby), and Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford (Shakespeare-Oxford). For the sake of space, (and personal preference), this paper will focus on the possibility of de Veres authorship, as well as the limitations on Shakespeares true authorship of the works. Contrasting the life of William Shakespeare, much is known about the life of Edward de Vere. He was born on April 12th, 1550 in Essex at Castle Hedingham as the 17th Earl of Oxford. As in Hamlet, his mother remarried in haste upon his fathers untimely death, making him ward of the court, and subsequently placed into the care of William Cecil (Lord Burghl ey), Lord Treasurer of England. As a teenager a Latin scholar (whose English translation of Ovids Metamorphoses is the second most influential work for Shakespeare, next to the bible), tutored him. By the age of twenty, de Vere had received two masters degrees from Queens College in Cambridge, and studied law for three years at Grays Inn. Once Cecil could wield power over the young Earl of Oxford, he broke off a previous marriage contract and instead betrothed him to his daughter Anne for the political advancement of the Cecil clan. Although the marriage produced three surviving daughters, it was not a happy one; Anne died in 1588 (Shakespeare-Oxford). De Vere is listed as the first among the poets of the Elizabethan period, and was also an active dramatist at the time. He maintained a band of tumblers as well as two theatre companies, Oxfords Boys and Oxfords Men, throughout the 1580s. He held an ardent interest in learning, and had 33 works of literature dedicated to him. He had a passion for travel, was a patron to the arts, and generally was a favorite in the court. In short, he was well educated and traveled, and had a strong knowledge of the inner workings of the court. So far, he seems to be at least qualified to have written the works of Shakespeare. .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 , .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .postImageUrl , .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 , .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87:hover , .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87:visited , .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87:active { border:0!important; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87:active , .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87 .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u2933f990740e9651b346e6c8c400dd87:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie Essay PaperIn the early 1590s de Vere met and married Elizabeth Trentham, one of the Queens maids of honor. In 1592 she bore their only child, Henry, who was heir to the earldom, but by this time he was deeply in debt and had lost all of his inherited estates. He died in June of 1604, and is presumably buried in buried in St. Augustines church, although there is also testimony that he lies buried in Westminster. So you ask, Why not the Shakespeare of Stratford? Why not just accept his authorship? Its not so much what he we know about him that is troublesome, but its what we dont know about him that makes it difficult to believe he could be the author of some of the greatest works in the history of mankind. In the time when the plays and writings of Shakespeare were tremendously popular, not a single person in the Elizabethan age directly addresses the identity of Shakespeare. In an age of letters and letter writing, nobody we know of ever corresponded with Shakespeare, and in an age of books, no record, not even Shakespeares will, ever points to his owning or using a single book (Van Duyn). His will, noted for its detailed disposition of his worldly possessions, there is no mention of manuscripts or anything of literary interest. Historys greatest manhunt has only netted six examples of the mans handwriting: all of the signatures on legal documents writing by other people, and all spelled in different ways. Incidentally, the first syllable in all of these signatures is spelled Shak, whereas the published plays and poems consistently spell the name Shake (Shakespeare-Oxford). In 1920 Thomas Looney published a book titled Shakespeare Identified in Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, which was the first to identify the Earl of Oxford as the author of the works by William Shakespeare. From this book sparked a wildfire of debate surrounding the issue of authorship, creating passionate supporters on either side of the issue. The Oxfordians, as de Veres many supporters are known, have long ago established their own society and remain dedicate to the cause of proving his authorship. In 1975, the Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition) commented that, Edward de Vere became in the 20th century the strongest candidate proposed for the authorship of Shakespeares plays (Shakespeare-Oxford). This guy seems to be a contender. The evidence supporting the Earl of Oxford is arguably strong. Whomever wrote the varied works of Shakespeare had to be familiar with a enormous body of knowledge for his time, including such subjects as law, music, foreign languages, the classics, sports and aristocratic manners. There is n o documentation of Shakespeare of Stratford having access to such information (Shakespeare-Oxford). Also, when de Vere was a young man, he spent much time traveling, particularly in Italy, which could explain the great detail used in the Shakespearean plays of Venice, as well as other European locations outside of England. There are no records of the Queen ever granting passage to Shakespeare, or Shakespeare, for travels abroad. Extremely strong evidence in favor of the Oxfordian theory is the acutely accurate knowledge of the inner court circles, as well as the political dealings within the monarchy. Throughout plays depicting royal families, such as King Richard and Hamlet, many inside conspiracies, jokes, and hidden knowledge of family disputes are riddled throughout the dialogues. These things were not common knowledge at the time, and only someone inside of the court could have been able to include it in the plays in such subtle ways. The true author must also have had intimate knowledge of some rare great works of literature. Works such as Venus and Adonis indicate not only knowledge of Goldings translation of Ovids Metamorphoses, but of the original as well, since Venus and Adonis translates many of Ovids lines omitted by Golding. Heres the tie-in to de Vere: Arthur Golding was the Earl of Oxfords uncle and lived in the Cecil household during the time that de Vere was a ward of Cecils. Golding also dedicated two of his other translations to the 17th Earl of Oxford (Shakespeare-Oxford). During the period that one of Edward de Veres daughters was betrothed to marry the Earl of Southampton, Shakespeares epic poems, Venus and Adonis and Lucrece, first appeared bearing a dedication to the Earl of Southampton. According to many scholars, Midsummer Nights Dream first graced the stage at another of de Veres daughters weddings (Van Duyn). In a 1589 book of poetry and poets, there is a mysterious reference to men of the court who have suffered it to be published without their own names to it and goes on to mention Edward de Vere as the best of these courtier poets if only his doings would be found out and made public with the rest. When Oxford passed away in 1604, King James had eight Shakespeare plays produced at court as a final tribute. When his widow died nine years later, fourteen Shakespeare plays were produced in tribute. Then in 1623, when two brothers put Shakespeares First Folio together, one of the men happened to be de Veres son-in-law. There are also many similarities between the works of Shakespeare and the life of de Vere. For example, in 1573 de Vere and several of his friends would play pranks and tricks on travelers along the same road between Rochester and Gravesend where prince Hals companions from the Boars Head Tavern did likewise in Henry IV, Part 1. (As a side note, its interesting that the Vere family crest featured a boars head on it.) Another more obvious example is the striking similarities between Hamlet and the actual life of the Earl of Oxford. Its practically an autobiography. Scholars have agreed that William Cecil inspired the character of Polonius, and the death of the King quickly followed by the Queens marriage reflects de Veres own parental circumstances. .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e , .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .postImageUrl , .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e , .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e:hover , .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e:visited , .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e:active { border:0!important; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e:active , .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub24f7786541f8d6221263b4e3949be3e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Klee EssayThe similarities also exist in the Shakespearean Sonnets as well. In Sonnet 37 and 66 he speaks of a frustrating lameness, not once, but several times. William Shakespeare may have been many things, but nowhere has it been documented that he was injured in a way that would have rendered him lame. On the other hand, de Vere was involved in a knife fight with a man named Knyvet who was seeking revenge on an illegitimately borne child by his cousin Ann Vavasour. The fight did produce a gaping wound on de Veres leg, and the illegitimate child created a temporary fall from the Queens grace and time served in the Tower of London. The most recent and compelling evidence that has been found supporting the Earl of Oxford lies in the studies of a graduate student Roger Stritmatter. He has spent the last five years researching the Shakespeare authorship question, and in the process discovered de Veres hand-annotated copy of the bible. It contains more than a hundred verses marked by de Vere that are also recognized by scholars today as primary biblical references in Shakespeares work. For instance, In Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 3,hamlet states that He took my father grossly, full of bread. The words full of bread have long been recognized by scholars as a reference to Ezekiel chapter 16, verse 49. Over a span of over 300 verses in the book of Ezekiel, he marks only one: Ezekiel 16:49. Another example is in King Henry IV, Part Two; the character Falstaff delivers the insult whoreson Achitophel! This is a direct reference to II Samuel 16:23, which de Vere underlined. In The Merry Wives of Windsor Falstaff brags, I fear no t Goliath with a weavers beam. Not only is has de Vere marked the scriptural source; he also underlined the words weavers beam within the biblical verse (Van Duyn). Granted, quoting Jesus from the scriptures is not exactly remarkable, but these are not common scriptures- they are ones that are arcane. Its beyond coincidence. Ironically, his bible was found in the great Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington, and has been there since 1925. While it might be easy for many to accept Edward de Veres authorship of the Shakespearean works, the more difficult question to answer is why he wouldnt sign his own name to the works. Many theories exist regarding this, one of which is that the subject matter in his works (killing a king and queen, for example) made it necessary to distance the writer from the work. Another is that it was unacceptable for courtiers to produce written works, so he paid Shakespeare to allow him to use his name on de Veres manuscripts. Sadly, this is a small but important fact that we will probably never know. But there again lies the beauty of the Shakespeare mystery. Although the subject of the true authorship of Shakespeares literature will probably never be laid to rest, it will always contribute to the enjoyment of studying his work. Students of the subject are compelled to read and re-read the plays and sonnets in an attempt to gain a better understanding of who was holding the pen. Debates involving fact and fiction keep the name Shakespeare in constant movement, reminding us that we have not outgrown him, not even after four hundred years. The writing of Shakespeare, whomever Shakespeare is, is a gift for us to continue unwrapping, and pass down to our children to appreciate as well. One must hope that the mystery will never be solved, so that it may never lose its magic. WORKS CITEDCharters, Ann. The Story and Its Writer. 5th (ed). Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 1999. What a great book of short stories. I find myself feeling the lives of each short story. It gave powerful information that I used through out my speech. Shakespeare, William. A Midsummer Nights Dream. New York: Washington Square Press, 1996. I originally read this in high school and again I found myself reading it to use it in my paper. In this play Shakespeare tries to entertain us with supernatural beings in a forest who more or less take humans under their influence to make them enjoy life and love as the only aims of humanity. Shakespeare Oxford Society. 27 Jun. 2001. http://www.shakespeare-oxford.comThis web sight was very useful in many ways. It had information on skeptics who have viewed Shakespeares work, a Shakespeare discussion page where you can go to talk basically about anything having to relate to Shakespeare, and it also helped me out a lot because it linked to a lot of other Shakespeare websites. Ogburn, Charlton. The Mysterious William Shakespeare: The Myth the Reality, New York: Simon Schuster Inc. 1992This is the finest work on the authorship question. If you have the patience, you will read the entire bulk of evidence backing up the idea that De Vere was in fact William Shakespeare. This book was amazing and it gave me loads of facts about De Vere and Shakespeare. Loney, J. Thomas. Shakespeare Identified in Edward De Vere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford, and the Poems of Edward De Vere. Lancaster, Pennsylvania Star Publishers. 1976. This book introduced the new idea that an aristocrat named Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford (1550- 1604), wrote the works of Shakespeare under a false name. Oxford is now considered the leading candidate for the authorship of the Shakespeare rule largely because of the influence this book has had. Words/ Pages : 3,080 / 24